The Treasury Department s Actions - 806 Words

The Treasury Department’s Actions During the largest recession the United States has seen since the great depression, the Treasury Department sprung into action to stave off another depression. Within a short period of time after the housing bubble burst, financial institutions started to fail. Credit and liquidity virtually vanished within days. The government was forced to react quickly to thwart a complete financial collapse. An estimate from the public interest group Better Markets has calculated the cost of the recession close to $12.8 trillion (Puzzanghera, 2012). This number is criticized since it includes losses in economic output, GDP, and bail-outs, while home equity losses and consumer net wealth are not. This figure does give a good idea of the magnitude of the Treasury Department’s actions. A multitude of industries, and companies received direct financial aid. The government identified key economic areas where policies were needed, and provided credit and liquidity for growth in those are as. The quick response of the Treasury Department helped in reducing the negative effects of the financial crisis. The three economic theories that I identified in this financial crisis consist of classical economics, Keynesian economics, and aggregate market (AS-AD) analysis. There was also a fear of monetarism which has not come to fruition at this time. Economic Theories Classical economics is considered one of the original economic theories. It is based on theShow MoreRelatedThe Division Of Foreign Assets Control773 Words   |  4 Pagesâ€Å"The Division of Foreign Assets Control was established in the Office of International Finance by a Treasury Department order in 1950, after People s Republic of China entered the Korean War. On October 15, 1962, through a Treasury Department order, the Division of Foreign Assets Control became the Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC). † The U.S. Department of the Treasury started administering the US economic sanctions against foreign states with the War against Britain in 1812, where SecretaryRead MoreThe Objective Of Loss Mitigation1339 Words   |  6 Pagesminimal loss. The Default Operations Department is part of the RCS Loss Mitigation Department, and work together with the other Loss Mitigation Departments to prevent a loan from going into a foreclosure status whenever possible. They play a key role in this process by providing the following services: †¢ Provide manual Pre-Foreclosure and Post-Foreclosure reviews of loans, before foreclosure a sale can occur. †¢ U.S. Treasury reporting for the Loss Mitigation Department. †¢ Review and identify all loansRead MoreRoles of the Office of Terrorism and Financial Intelligence Essay839 Words   |  4 Pagespersons or organizations for potential designation, the United States works with authorities from several other nations and with international organizations, such as the European Union (EU) and the United Nations (UN). Money Laundering Financial Action Task Force (FATF)​ is an international policymaking and standard setting agency dedicated to prevent money laundering and terrorist financing. Created by the G-7 in 1989 in response to a growing concern of money laundering, the FATFs mission is toRead MoreDepartment Of Homeland Security And Terrorism1517 Words   |  7 PagesDEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY The events that occurred on September 11th, 2001, changed the United States and the rest of the world. President George W. Bush declared a war on terrorism on national television, during a joint session of Congress on September 20th, 2001. The President’s words echoed the cries of this country and during his speech he went step-by-step in his explanation of the events and actions moving forward. After explaining to the nation the details of the events that occurredRead MoreAn Internal Central Intelligence Agency1579 Words   |  7 Pages(9/11 Commission Report). The U.S Intelligence Community is made up of 15 different agencies, offices, and organizations within the Executive branch. There are 8 components in the Department of Defense, two in the department of Homeland Security, and one in each of the separate State, Energy, Treasury, and Justice departments, and one independent agency, the CIA (COICUS, 2005 APP C). Prior to 9/11 each of these agencies and components ar e competing for relevance and funding. They had different goalsRead MoreMarket Crisis And Its Effects On The Housing Market1460 Words   |  6 Pagescausing huge problems for those involved in the mortgage securitization market. On September 7th, 2008 when the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) place both Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac under government conservatorship. In addition, the US Department of Treasury agreed to inject up to $100 million into each GSE in order to provide liquidity and to continue purchasing mortgage-backed securities in the market. This would slow the US housing market’s downward spiral. In return, the government would beRead MoreFinancial Management : Debt Management Essay1650 Words   |  7 Pageswith the Treasury s obligation organization approach, the issuance of Treasury and administrative financial securities, and monetary organization (Treasury.gov, 2015). Furthermore, the Office creates official Treasury s yield curve, certifies and sets interest rates for Federal loaning and the security of the government market. Decisions reached by the management body are declared as a component of their paying back the debt in a four months period. The department works with the treasury CommitteeRead MoreThe Department Of Homeland Security1602 Words   |  7 PagesThe Department of Homeland Security The Department of Homeland Security is an agency made up of 22 different federal agencies which were combined in an effort to streamline the United States effectiveness in defending our nation. The core mission of the Department of Homeland Security include prevent terrorism and enhancing security, secure and manage our borders, enforce and administer our immigration laws, safeguard and secure cyberspace, ensure resilience to disasters (Department of HomelandRead MoreThe Mission Of The Division Of Taxation951 Words   |  4 PagesDivision s statutory mandates. N.J.A.C. 18.1- 1.1(a). The Division is responsible for the collection of 39 different taxes and fees. The Division audits tax returns and taxpaying entities, processes tax refunds and rebates, takes collection and enforcement actions to secure tax liabilities, investigates tax matters having civil or criminal potential, and provides other tax-related services to the public and tax practitioners. The Division of Revenue, a sister agency within the Treasury DepartmentRead MoreGeorge Washington : A Great Leader1719 Words   |  7 PagesWhenever any American hears the name George Washington, they immediately connect the name to heroic qualities. Washington was one of America s founding fathers that served as a general in the American Revolution and the first President of America. His leadership qualities in the revolution made him a no brainer choice by the delegates to be elected as first president. What made Washington such a great leader? What qualities made him into the leader he was? And finally, what precedents did Washington

National Backlog of Untested Rape Kits - 1904 Words

Policy Analysis A. What is the policy? There exists national backlog of untested rape kits. This is an outrage with disastrous consequences for sexual assault victims. Currently, around 400,000 rape kits sit unexamined in laboratories and in police storage across the country—each one of them containing the potential to solve a crime, incarcerate a rapist and provide a victim with the justice they deserve. There are two types of rape kit backlogs in the United States: the publicly-known backlog of unexamined kits that have already been submitted to labs for testing and the secreted backlog of kits in law enforcement safekeeping that have not been sent for testing. This latter backlog is of particular concern since the programs already in place to reduce backlogs in laboratories, were not intended to address unexamined evidence stored in police stations. http://www.cornyn.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?p=InNewsContentRecord_id=d005d0ed-c1ad-4971-ad7b-edf6ffb20307 . Implementing the Sexual Assault Forensic Evidence Reporting (SAFER) Act would help State and local law enforcement agencies to end both the police storage and laboratory rape kit backlogs by providing State and local governments with subsidy to conduct one-year audits of the unexamined sexual assault evidence in their possession. http://www.cornyn.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?p=InNewsContentRecord_id=d005d0ed-c1ad-4971-ad7b-edf6ffb20307 . The act would also create a nationwide sexual assault forensicShow MoreRelatedThe Rape Kits Should Not Be Tested1164 Words   |  5 PagesWhy Backlogged Rape Kits Should Not Be Tested Imagine being an overworked investigator. More and more cases flood the desks of everyone, even though they are already pushed to their breaking point. Each person tries to handle each case that comes in, but some of these cases have no hope of ever becoming trials. Should not those cases be dropped, so investigators can focus on current cases that need immediate attention? This scenario ensues everyday in not only the offices of police and investigators

Down Syndrome Essay Research Paper Down Syndrome free essay sample

Down Syndrome Essay, Research Paper Down Syndrome or Trisomy 21 as it is besides normally known, is a familial status that for many old ages has been shrouded in fright, darkness A ; shame. There is absoultely nil to fear, and at that place neer should be any feelings of shame, it is non the individuals mistake. The lone darkness associated with down syndrome is the ignorance many people have towards it. Basically down syndrome means that a individual has one excess chromosome in each of the milions of cells in their organic structure. Alternatively of 46 chromosomes individuals with down syndrome have 47 chromosomes. The excess chromosome happens at the 21st brace, therefore TRISOMY 21. It can and does go on to anyone. When was down syndrome discovered? The late nineteenth century John Langdon Down, an English doctor, published an accurate description of a individual with down syndrome. It was published in 1866 and earned Down the acknowledgment as # 8220 ; father # 8221 ; of the syndrome. We will write a custom essay sample on Down Syndrome Essay Research Paper Down Syndrome or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page Throughout the twentieth century, progresss in medical specialty A ; scientific discipline enabled research workers to look into the features of people with down syndrome. It was subsequently determined that an excess partial or complete 21st chromosome consequences in the features associated with down syndrome. Why is down syndrome referred to as a familial status? The human organic structure is made up of cells, all cells contain a centre, called a karyon, in which familial stuff is stored. This familial stuff, knowsn as cistrons, carries the codifications responsible for all our familial features. Genes are grouped along rod-like constructions called chromosomes. Normally, the karyon of each cell contains 23 braces of chromosomes, half of which are inherited from each parent. In down syndrome, nevertheless the cells normally contain non 46, but 47 chromosomes, with the excess chromosome being a figure 21. This extra familial stuff in the signifier of extra cistrons along the 21st chromosome, consequences in down syndrome. Because 95 per centum of all instances of down syndrome oocur because there are three transcripts of the 21st chromosome, it is referred to as # 8220 ; trisomy 21 # 8243 ; . What causes down syndrome? Down syndrome is normally caused by an mistake in cell division called nondisjunction. Nondisjunction is a faulty cell division which consequences in an embryo with three figure 21 chromosomes, alternatively of two. Prior to it, or at, construct, a brace of figure 21 chromosomes in either a sperm or the egg, fail to seperate. As the embryo develops, the excess chromosome is replicated in every cell of the organic structure. Why nondisjunction occurs is presently unknown, although it does look to be related to progressing maternal age. About 80 per centum of kids born with down syndrome are born to adult females over 35 old ages of age. This is because younger adult females have higher birthrate rates. Although nondisjunction can be of paternal beginning, this occurs less often. Because this mistake in a cell division is frequently present in the egg prior to construct, and adult females are born with their complete shop of eggs, it has been postulated that some environmental factors may be implicated in nondisjunction. However, despite old ages of research, the cause of nondisjunction is still unknown. There seems to be no connexion between any type of down syndrome and parents activities before or during a gestation. Mosaicism occurs wen nondisjunction of the 21st chromosome takes topographic point in one of the initial cell divisions after fertilisation. When this occurs, there is a mixture of two types of cells, some incorporating 46 chromosomes A ; some incorporating 47. Because of the # 8220 ; mosaic # 8221 ; form of the cells, the term mosaicism is used.

The Psychological Impact of the Patriot Act on the American Public

Introduction The advent of modern civilization has transformed governments into critical institutions. The importance attached to governments hinges on the view that they take responsibility for indispensable aspects of the wellbeing of their people. The sustenance of these principal responsibilities requires governments to adopt policies that are consistent with their development agenda.Advertising We will write a custom research paper sample on The Psychological Impact of the Patriot Act on the American Public specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More A good example of such a scenario is the United States’ enactment of the Patriot Act 2001 in the wake of the 9/11 terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon coupled with the anthrax deaths that followed shortly afterwards (Skitka, Bauman Mullen, 2004). The involved policymakers drafted and enacted the Act hastily with nearly unanimous support from the entire US fra ternity with the hope that it would curb any further attempts to instigate similar attacks against the Americans. The perception of the people has changed from unanimous acceptance of the legislation to a state of ambivalence. In the light of this development, this paper seeks to explore the psychological impacts of the US Patriot Act on the Americans and unearth the reasons behind the change of attitude towards the Act. Historical overview of the US Patriotic Act 2001 The US Patriot Act of 2001 was enacted hardly six weeks after the terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon. The name â€Å"USA PATRIOT† is an acronym for â€Å"United and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism† (Hamm, 2004, p.6). According to Abdolian and Takooshian (2002), after the 9/11 attacks there followed a notable number of anthrax deaths, which were perceived to emanate from the use of biological weaponry in the quest to perpetuate terror against the US public. Like the Antiterrorism Act of 2006 and other similar legislation in the past, the US Patriot Act of 2001 drew sharp criticism later and it remains the subject of incessant debates to date. Reservations have been expressed over the Act’s curtailment of fundamental liberties of the American people. This situation is aggravated by the view that the US was founded on a philosophy of democracy, which espouses liberty and equality for all. In this sense, the Act is inconsistent with the long-standing values of the US and thus it marks a major step in the departure from the foundational philosophies of the United States of America. The psychological impact The Act was almost unanimously welcome at the time of its enactment. The legislature overwhelmingly voted in favor of the Act (Abdolian Takooshian, 2002). The position of the larger public was not any different as Skitka, Bauman, and Mullen (2004) assert that over two thirds of the US publ ic was in favor of the Act at the time of its enactment.Advertising Looking for research paper on government? Let's see if we can help you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More Skitka, Bauman, and Mullen (2004) observe that 49% percent of the US public was willing to sacrifice part of its civil liberties in favor of the fight against terrorism after the Oklahoma bombing of 1995. The figure rose to about 68% after the 2001 attacks, but was only 29% in 1997 when there was considerable calm (Skitka, Bauman Mullen, 2004).Therefore, the overwhelming support for the Patriot Act seems to have been largely sentimental. Many people including the legislators who passed the Act are on record saying that in retrospect, they conceded that their opinion of the Act was initially inspired by fear or simply not bothering to find out what it contained due to anxiety. For instance, Hamm (2004) notes that some legislators reiterated that the Patriot Act of 2001 was the worst legi slation they ever passed. It is extrapolated that less than five percent of the legislators who voted for the Act read it before voting in its favor (Hamm, 2004). Kashan (2009) notes that almost immediately after its enactment, the Act sparked heated debates all across the USA. There were numerous offensive provisions whose implications eluded its proponents until later when the Act came into full force. The Act allows the US Department of Justice to Tap telephones, e-mail messages, and personal computer hard drives (including roving wiretaps), without a legal probable cause, request private and personal business and bank records, without a court hearing, and solicit a patron’s list of library books. †¦investigate a person who is not suspected of a crime and/or is not the target of a terrorist investigation, secretly conduct â€Å"sneak-and-peek† searches without a warrant, withhold the names and other information about individuals arrested and detained, hold clos ed hearings, and monitor jailhouse conversations between attorneys and clients (Hamm, 2004, p.6). By all standards, this Act is the most overbearing legislation ever enacted in the history of the US (Bloss, 2009). The public expressed reservations for the legislation almost immediately after its enactment because of what followed. The 9/11 terror arrestees were reportedly mistreated in many ways while in custody. They were physically abused, denied the opportunity to see their attorneys, and detained for long periods without being informed of their offences (Hamm, 2004). In addition, the arrestees were largely Muslims or of Arab origin (Hamm, 2004). Despite the view that the perpetrators of the 9/11 attacks were Muslims or of Arab origin, it was not reason enough to brand every Muslim or Arab a terrorist. Intriguingly, this description underscores exactly what the government did and more so, with levels of impunity that prompted the US people to start thinking differently about the future implications of the Patriot Act. The Act was devised to prevent further terrorist attacks against the US, but it has been massively abused. Hamm (2004) observes that the FBI has been gathering intelligence on the activities of American environmental and anti-globalization organizations, which are well known not to engage in any terrorist activities.Advertising We will write a custom research paper sample on The Psychological Impact of the Patriot Act on the American Public specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More Hamm (2004) adds that in the state of Indiana, FBI officers are reported to have approached a local librarian and demanded access to the borrowing records of certain Muslim students of Indiana University. The librarian declined, but he was threatened with arrest. Section 215 of the Patriot Act permits an FBI agent to obtain a subpoena from some designated courts and use it to gain access to anyone’s records without their knowledge. This would have been the case if the agents in the Indiana case had obtained the subpoena before their visit to the library. Intriguingly, they chose to visit the library without the document and threatened the librarian with arrest due to refusal to cooperate. In a separate case, President Bush’s administration sparked controversy when an American born citizen, Jose Padilla, accused of plotting a bomb attack, was incarcerated in solitary confinement for over three years without a right to trial because he was considered an enemy combatant (Kashan, 2009). The important question that arises in the light of such occurrences is whether the Patriot Act is worth the sacrifice that US citizens so willingly made for the sake of safety and security. Bloss (2009) argues that the hostility that US citizens show towards the Patriot Act is founded on the discovery that their liberties were sacrificed in exchange for security against terror attacks, yet this Act does not provide the purported security. Instead, they feel targeted due to the numerous unlawful actions by the security machinery against the public. Psychologically, this Act has kept the US public in constant anxiety because their confidence in the idea that the Act could enhance their security has waned over the years. The confidence has been replaced by frustration and feelings of betrayal because their long cherished liberties, such as the right to privacy among others, were sacrificed without being given the chance to give their opinions yet in the end they are at the receiving end. At the time of enactment of the Act, it is reported that over two thirds of the US public were in its favor. Naturally, everyone would expect such a reaction from the people especially if the devastating nature of the 9/11 terror attacks is considered. At the time of enacting the Patriot Act 2001, the US public emotionally and psychologically devastated. In that state, they could have welcomed anything t hat purported to provide security against similar attacks. They thus welcomed the Act with a sense of relief knowing that anyone attempting to plot a similar attack would be incarcerated.Advertising Looking for research paper on government? Let's see if we can help you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More However, in the years that have followed its enactment, it has gradually dawned on US citizens that their relief was misplaced because the Patriot Act does not actually have the ability to eliminate terrorism as initially thought. Thus, the US public is constantly aware of the fact that the threat of terror attacks lives on. This creates a feeling of disappointment and gives them a resigned attitude over the same because efforts that have been made to alter the Act have all proved futile. The US citizens feel betrayed because although they expressed support for the Act, that was only after it had been enacted. The Act was completely devoid of their input even at the lowest level yet it took away the fundamental right to privacy. It is arguable that they were robbed of their privacy. This move creates a feeling of betrayal because for the average US citizen, his/her right to privacy is no more yet the fear of terror attacks still lives. This situation reflects the assertion by Zelman (2002) that citizenry that willingly gives up its liberties to the government in exchange for security and protection ends up losing both. In the US case, terrorism is still a reality that can manifest anywhere in the US at any time and on top of that, their every activity is monitored by the government. The Patriot Act trampled the right to privacy in the name of ensuring national security (Nieto, Johnston-Dodds Simmons, 2002). The gist of the controversy over this development is that the government has failed to use the freedom it gained through the Act objectively. Prior to this Act, the law cushioned the public against arbitrary action by the government. In addition, it was not possible for the government to eavesdrop on anyone or access any private records without permission from a court law (Nieto, Johnston-Dodds Simmons, 2002). Arguably, under such circumstances, it was a cinch for the unscrupulous individuals and groups to perpetuate all sorts of unethical and unlawful ac tivities against the US citizens, as although security agencies employed the best available intelligence techniques, they could not penetrate the private communication of individuals or groups to identify plots of terror attacks or other criminal activities. Thus, prior to the Patriot Act, the constitution’s position on human rights was an impediment to the ability of security agencies to combat terrorism (Zelman, 2002). This assertion is supported by the view that despite the government’s endeavors to fight terrorism; acts of terrorism were successfully planned and executed in the US. Logically, this planning involved people within the US communicating with others from outside the US, yet due to the law, the government was incapacitated and could not single out such communication and possibly avert the attacks. The devastating nature of the terror attacks recorded in the history of the US and specifically the 9/11 attacks made it permissible to sacrifice privacy right s to avert similar attacks. Law-abiding citizens who have nothing to hide need not have any problems with legislations such as the Patriot Act 0f 2001. The government needed to have to access to the records of every form of communication in order to work effectively with the Act, which implies that there is no way some elements of privacy could be exempted from the Patriot Act and still have it work effectively. The controversy surrounding the act should thus be blamed fully on the government as after obtaining the authority it required, it has failed to use the authority responsibly and objectively. It would not be so much of an issue if the government strictly adhered to the purpose of the Act and treated people lawfully during its enforcement. Conclusion The US Patriot Act was a well-intentioned piece of legislation that sought to enable the government deal firmly with terrorism. It is unfortunate that the manner in which it has been enforced has sparked furious debates on its su itability. Life is more important than privacy, but the government has failed to use its acquired authority constructively for the good of the US public. Security agencies seem to be spying for the sake of spying for the law allows it. Even though no terrorist attacks have been recorded since its enactment, the government has failed to use the Patriot Act for the intended use and it has instead turned it against the US Public. This move is not acceptable considering that the citizens lost their right to privacy for the sake of this legislation. Objectivity and goodwill need to be maintained if the Act is to be used effectively and without any major controversies. Recommendations To stop unscrupulous law enforcement agents from taking undue advantage over the public under the guise of implementing the Patriot Act, strict measures need to put in place to help identify such agents and severely punish them to restore public trust in the Act. The government should open up the extent and mechanisms of enforcing of this Act to the public scrutiny. The enforcement of this act is shrouded in secrecy yet the Act only curtailed the right to privacy and not right to information. References Abdolian, L., Takooshian, H. (2002). The USA Patriot Act: Civil liberties, the media and public opinion. Fordham Urban Law Journal, 30(4), 1429-1453. Bloss, W. (2009). Transforming U.S. police surveillance in a new privacy paradigm. Police Practice and Research, 10(3), 225-238. Hamm, M. (2004). The USA Patriot Act and the politics of fear. London, UK: Cavendish. Kashan, S. (2009). The USA Patriot Act: Impact on freedoms and civil liberties. ESSAI, 7(8), 86-90. Nieto, M., Johnston-Dodds, K., Simmons, C. (2002). Public and private applications of video surveillance and biometric technologies. Sacramento, CA: California Research Bureau. Skitka, J., Bauman, W., Mullen, E. (2004). Political tolerance and coming to psychological closure following the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks : An integrative approach. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30(6), 743-756. Zelman, J. (2002). Recent developments in international law: Anti-terrorism legislation-part two: The impact and consequences. Journal of Transnational Law Policy, 11(2), 421-441. This research paper on The Psychological Impact of the Patriot Act on the American Public was written and submitted by user Natasha M. to help you with your own studies. You are free to use it for research and reference purposes in order to write your own paper; however, you must cite it accordingly. You can donate your paper here.